ArticleRadiology case reports2026
A rare presentation of male breast schwannoma.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast schwannomas are rare benign tumors originating from Schwann cells of peripheral nerves. They are exceedingly uncommon in the male breast and are often misdiagnosed as gynecomastia, particularly in patients on prolactin-elevating medications. We report a case of a 40-year-old male with a longstanding palpable mass in the upper outer quadrant of the left chest wall. The patient had a history of schizoaffective disorder and was on antipsychotic therapy, initially leading to the clinical presumption of gynecomastia. Diagnostic mammography revealed a well-circumscribed, noncalcified mass adjacent to the pectoralis muscle. Ultrasound demonstrated a heterogeneously hypoechoic lesion with cystic changes, classified as BI-RADS 4. Ultrasound-guided core biopsy revealed a schwannoma with S100 positivity which was confirmed on final surgical pathology after excision. This case underscores the importance of maintaining a broad differential for male breast masses and highlights the limitations of imaging alone in distinguishing rare benign neoplasms from malignancy. Biopsy remains essential for diagnosis, particularly in patients with confounding clinical risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.