ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2026
Biomechanical Stability of Intramedullary Nailing vs Plate Fixation in Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures Under Axial Loading: A Systematic Review.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: From a biomechanical perspective, intramedullary fixation offers potential benefits, including a central load-sharing axis that may better withstand axial and bending forces, while preserving the periosteal blood supply and reducing soft tissue damage. This review aimed to determine whether intramedullary nailing in displaced intra-articular fractures provides comparable or superior biomechanical stability to plate fixation. Methods: A literature search identified studies comparing the biomechanical stability of intramedullary fixation with plate fixation, screw-only fixation, or combined constructs in calcaneal fractures. Eligible studies used human cadaveric specimens or computational models, examined biomechanical outcomes such as stiffness, load to failure, displacement, or stress distribution, and employed laboratory, cadaveric (n = 3), or finite element analyses (n = 4). Results: Experimental and numerical studies showed that intramedullary fixation consistently provides greater or comparable construct stiffness and load to failure than locking plates, with no implant failures observed. Plates produced higher stress concentrations at screw junctions, whereas intramedullary nails yielded a more uniform stress distribution in most models; however, 1 finite element analysis study reported higher calcaneal bone stress with intramedullary nail fixation. Conclusion: Intramedullary calcaneal fixation provides comparable or superior biomechanical stability to plate fixation, especially under cyclic axial loading. Construct durability appears more dependent on axial load sharing than on implant category alone. Whether these biomechanical findings translate to improved clinical outcomes remains to be demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.