ReviewMedComm2026
Toward Autonomous Clinics: Human-Robot Collaboration in Clinical Care.
Review in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic systems are entering clinical care, but full autonomy remains constrained by patient variability, safety requirements, dynamic clinical environments, and the need for professional oversight. Human-robot collaboration (HRC) offers a more realistic path: clinicians retain judgment and responsibility, while robots and AI support sensing, planning, action, and decision-making within defined task boundaries. In this narrative review, we examine recent advances in clinical HRC from a systems perspective, covering system architecture, learning and control, safety mechanisms, autonomy assessment, and real-world deployment. We propose a dual-brain framework, comprising a professional brain for clinical reasoning and decision support, and a physical brain for embodied sensing, planning, and task execution. Using examples from imaging, rehabilitation, surgery, and outpatient care, we argue that clinical autonomy is developing in stages from clinician-supervised imaging and decision support to bounded robotic subtasks and workflow-level coordination, instead of through unsupervised replacement of healthcare professionals. We further discuss how robustness, trust, accountability, and human factors shape safe adoption in practice. By framing autonomy as collaborative rather than substitutive, this review provides a unifying foundation for designing and evaluating the next generation of autonomous clinical systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.