Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42502711›Full record

ReviewMedComm2026

Toward Autonomous Clinics: Human-Robot Collaboration in Clinical Care.

Xinyuan Wu, Jingrao Zhang, Mengdi Xu, Henry K Chu, Xiaolan Chen, Pingting Zhong, Bowen Liu, Mingguang He, Danli Shi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xinyuan WuSchool of Optometry The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong SAR China.
Jingrao ZhangFaculty of Science and Technology University of Macau Macau China.
Mengdi XuInstitute For Interdisciplinary Information Sciences Tsinghua University Beijing China.
Henry K ChuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong SAR China.
Xiaolan ChenSchool of Optometry The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong SAR China.
Pingting ZhongSchool of Optometry The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong SAR China.
Bowen LiuSchool of Optometry The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong SAR China.
Mingguang HeSchool of Optometry The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong SAR China.
Danli ShiSchool of Optometry The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong SAR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic systems are entering clinical care, but full autonomy remains constrained by patient variability, safety requirements, dynamic clinical environments, and the need for professional oversight. Human-robot collaboration (HRC) offers a more realistic path: clinicians retain judgment and responsibility, while robots and AI support sensing, planning, action, and decision-making within defined task boundaries. In this narrative review, we examine recent advances in clinical HRC from a systems perspective, covering system architecture, learning and control, safety mechanisms, autonomy assessment, and real-world deployment. We propose a dual-brain framework, comprising a professional brain for clinical reasoning and decision support, and a physical brain for embodied sensing, planning, and task execution. Using examples from imaging, rehabilitation, surgery, and outpatient care, we argue that clinical autonomy is developing in stages from clinician-supervised imaging and decision support to bounded robotic subtasks and workflow-level coordination, instead of through unsupervised replacement of healthcare professionals. We further discuss how robustness, trust, accountability, and human factors shape safe adoption in practice. By framing autonomy as collaborative rather than substitutive, this review provides a unifying foundation for designing and evaluating the next generation of autonomous clinical systems.

Indexed as

clinical autonomyembodied intelligencehuman–robot collaborationmedical roboticssafety‐critical roboticsshared control

Identifiers

PMID42502711
PMCPMC13401152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.