ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
Family planning and multiple sclerosis - part 2: Does real-world practice align with Swedish treatment guidelines?
Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Managing family planning and treatment in women with multiple sclerosis (MS) requires balancing disease control with medication safety. Despite guidelines, practice often adapts to individual needs, with clinicians adjusting disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) to protect maternal and fetal health. This study examines pregnancy-related MS treatment in Sweden. Methods: We identified 130 women (153 pregnancies) from a 2021 online MS questionnaire and linked responses to the Swedish MS register to capture DMT use during three periods: 25 weeks before conception, pregnancy (≈40 weeks), and 25 weeks postpartum. DMTs were classified as "accepted," "discontinuation recommended"-requiring monitoring, or "not recommended" in planned pregnancy. Results: Before conception, among 153 pregnancies, 26% involved DMTs considered acceptable before and during pregnancy, while 55% involved DMTs for which discontinuation before conception is recommended-of which rituximab accounted for nearly half of all pregnancies (47%, n = 72). Three percent were exposed to ´not recommended´ DMTs, and 16% had no prior treatment. Overall, 29% discontinued DMTs before or shortly after conception, while 58% (n = 88) had ongoing or recent treatment exposure, defined as treatment administered within 6 months before conception or, in a minority of cases, after conception. Among these, 50% (n = 77) involved rituximab-and 13% remained untreated. Postpartum, 58% resumed treatment, 3% remained under long-lasting DMT effects, and 39% did not initiate DMT, likely due to breastfeeding. Discussion: Overall, real-world practice in Sweden broadly aligns with national recommendations, with widespread use of rituximab before pregnancy reflecting its perceived safety and durable effect, alongside some individualized deviations from discontinuation guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.