ArticleEJVES vascular forum2026
A Technique to Avoid Endograft Lumen Narrowing during Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair in Chronic Dissections.
Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of retrograde branches during endovascular aortic arch repair in chronic dissections has been associated with endograft lumen compression in the distal arch true lumen. This results in a functional pseudocoarctation, which carries a risk of cardiac failure. Technique: This exemplar case presents a patient treated with a three-branch arch endograft for an anastomotic false aneurysm and a residual chronic arch dissection extending to the supra-aortic trunks. To overcome device compression, a kissing angioplasty of the endograft and the left common carotid artery branch was performed after achieving wire access to the left subclavian artery. This manoeuvre successfully disrupted the distal arch lamella while securing the left common carotid artery bridging stent and maintaining access to the left subclavian artery. Discussion: This technique is now routinely performed in all patients presenting with chronic aortic dissections. In the authors' limited recent experience with short-term follow up, no instances of cardiac failure secondary to endograft lumen narrowing have been observed since implementing this manoeuvre. It appears to be a feasible and effective method for overcoming endograft lumen compression and its associated complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.