ArticleJournal of exercise science and fitness2026
A school-level randomized preliminary study of in-classroom physical activity breaks among fifth graders.
Article in Journal of exercise science and fitness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In-classroom physical activity breaks (IcPABs) are a pragmatic strategy to reduce sedentary time and promote movement during instructional lessons. However, evidence from primary schools operating within a high-stakes examination-focused education system, where academic achievement in national assessments is prioritized in classroom instruction is limited from low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to examine the preliminary effects and feasibility of a teacher-led, in-classroom physical activity break intervention on school-time movement behaviors, academic performance, and selected health-related outcomes among Sri Lankan fifth-grade students. Methods: 220 students from two government primary schools in Sri Lanka (mean Results: Significant group-by-time effects were observed for reading performance (82.2 ± 13.9 to 88.0 ± 12.9 vs 76.7 ± 10.5 to 77.6 ± 13.0 in controls), MVPA (27.2 ± 9.4 to 44.3 ± 9.9 vs 31.1 ± 8.4 to 24.3 ± 9.4), step count (5609 ± 1019 to 7769 ± 1339 vs 7998 ± 1023 to 3942 ± 1046), and sedentary school time (1490.7 ± 53.1 to 1475.4 ± 59.4 vs 1485.0 ± 22.9 to 1655.1 ± 40.8). The study fidelity assessment confirmed 1 to 4 times daily activity implementation. The process evaluation indicated satisfactory participant engagement and smooth implementation, suggesting the study was conducted as intended. Conclusion: This school level randomized preliminary study observed improvements in reading performance, while effects on mathematics and health-related outcomes were limited. However, in-classroom physical activity breaks were feasible to implement in an academically intensive Sri Lankan primary school context and were associated with favorable changes in school-time movement behaviors. Yet larger multi-school trials are expected to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.