ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
NICE-Informed Quality Improvement for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Single-Centre Two-Cycle Audit of the Two-week Referral-to-Injection Standard.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a time-critical cause of irreversible central vision loss. National audit standards operationalise timely treatment as intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy within two weeks of community referral. This retrospective, single-centre, two-cycle quality improvement audit evaluated compliance with the referral-to-first-injection (RTFI) standard and the impact of targeted service optimisation on pathway performance and early outcomes. Methods: Cycle 1 included 81 consecutive community referrals receiving first intravitreal injection for nAMD at Luton and Dunstable University Hospital (March-December 2024); Cycle 2 included 50 patients (May-November 2025). The primary outcome was the proportion meeting the two-week RTFI target. Referral-to-first-appointment (RTFA) and first-appointment-to-first-injection (FATFI) intervals were analysed as pathway components. Secondary outcomes were change in ETDRS visual acuity and OCT-derived central macular thickness (CMT) between baseline and first post-injection follow-up. Following Cycle 1, interventions included a one-week internal assessment deadline, increased injection capacity, and enhanced clinician awareness of referral timelines. Results: Demographics were similar across cycles (Cycle 1: 60% female, median age 84; Cycle 2: 54% female, median age 81). Two-week RTFI compliance increased from 41% (33/81) to 76% (38/50) after service optimisation (χ Conclusion: Pragmatic service redesign was associated with significantly improved compliance with the two-week RTFI standard for nAMD, driven by faster first assessment and more reliable injection delivery. Residual delays were predominantly patient-related, supporting patient-facing interventions and further audit cycles to assess sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.