ArticlePEC innovation2026
"I need to find ways, and I've not yet been successful": Exploring adaptive challenges and adaptive leadership as experienced by patients with gastrointestinal malignancy.
Article in PEC innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the advent of shared-decision making, person-centered care, and early palliative care, many oncology patients and oncologists may face challenges that are not easily solved within these existing paradigms. Adaptive healthcare has been proposed as a framework with which to understand complex problems and guide physician actions. However, it is unknown to what extent patients would endorse this framework as applicable to their own experience. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients selected through purposive sampling. Interviews were analyzed both deductively using Heifetz' adaptive leadership framework, and inductively for new insights in a qualitative descriptive approach. Results: Twelve interviews were conducted. Despite good conceptual understanding of adaptive challenges, some participants struggled to analyze own experiences using this lens. Nonetheless, numerous adaptive challenges and responses to them were identified. Innovation: Divergent from the original adaptive leadership framework, some patients deliberately chose not to adapt in some domains as a means of maintaining autonomy in the midst of upheaval. Our results suggest that consideration of patient autonomy be integrated into the adaptive healthcare if it is to be applied to oncology. Conclusions: Patients with advanced colon or pancreatic cancer reported facing numerous adaptive challenges, confirming the applicability of the conceptual framework to the patient experience. The highly individual nature of the adaptive challenges faced, and the individual variability in responses to challenges, calls for oncologists to carefully explore challenges faced by their patients, as well as patients' preferred way to address them, in order to optimize and individualize adaptive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.