ArticleCureus2026
Attitude-Practice Gap in Ecopharmacology: A Cross-Sectional Study of Healthcare Professionals in Western Maharashtra, India.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The accumulation of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in the environment poses a serious global threat, accelerating antimicrobial resistance and disrupting ecosystems. Since standard wastewater treatment plants cannot fully degrade these pollutants, mitigating pharmaceutical wastes must begin at the source. Consequently, healthcare professionals play a critical role in prescribing sustainably and guiding patients in disposing of their medication. Given this responsibility, this study assesses and compares the knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding ecopharmacology among different tiers of healthcare professionals and identifies specific barriers preventing sustainable clinical action. Materials and methods An analytical cross-sectional, observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in western Maharashtra, India. The study analyzed 493 participants, including medical interns, residents, consultants, and nurses, using descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, a chi-square test, and multivariable logistic regression models. Results Despite 88.8% (n=438) of professionals recognizing pharmaceutical pollution as a severe risk, a distinct attitude-practice gap emerged. Personally, 61.0% (n=301) of participants discard leftover drugs into regular household trash. Clinically, only 22.3% (n=110) consider environmental impacts when prescribing, and only 29.0% (n=143) routinely counsel their patients on disposal. Logistic regression revealed that textbook knowledge did not predict proactive counseling. Instead, personal communication confidence is the strongest driver, explaining why experienced consultants counsel significantly more than recent graduates despite lower theoretical scores. To overcome these barriers, participants demanded systemic interventions: 91.5% (n=451) requested hospital take-back centers, 88.2% (n=435) demanded extended producer responsibility (EPR) from manufacturers, and 73.0% (n=360) requested practical continuing medical education training. Conclusion High environmental awareness does not organically translate into sustainable medical practice. Bridging this gap requires a systemic shift, modernizing medical education to focus on patient communication skills and establishing an accessible medication take-back infrastructure supported by industry EPR mandates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.