ArticleCureus2026
Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Variant Foramina of the Clivus: A Retrospective Study From a Tertiary Dental Institution in South India.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAnatomical variants involving the clivus, including Canalis Basilaris Medianus (CBM), Craniopharyngeal Canal (CPC), and Fossa Navicularis Magna (FNM), are uncommon developmental osseous defects that are usually identified incidentally during radiographic examination. Although generally asymptomatic, these variants may mimic pathological lesions or fractures and may possess important clinical and surgical implications. Large field-of-view cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans provide an opportunity for incidental identification of such variants during routine dental imaging. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and demographic distribution of anatomical variant foramina involving the clivus in archived CBCT scans obtained from a tertiary dental institution in South India. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective observational study was conducted using 50 archived large field-of-view CBCT scans retrieved from the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai. CBCT scans were evaluated in axial, coronal, and sagittal sections for the presence of CBM, CPC, and FNM. Demographic distribution and prevalence of variants were assessed using descriptive statistics, and associations between variables were evaluated using the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test.
resultsClival anatomical variants were identified in 20 (40.0%) subjects. CBM was the most frequently observed variant (12, 24.0%), followed by CPC (5, 10.0%) and FNM (5, 10.0%). CBM demonstrated a relatively uniform age distribution, whereas CPC showed a statistically significant association with age group (p = 0.033). FNM was identified only among male subjects in the present sample, although this association did not reach statistical significance. Co-occurrence of two variants was identified in two (10.0%) positive cases.
conclusionClival anatomical variants may be encountered as incidental findings on large field-of-view CBCT scans and can be identified during routine radiographic evaluation. Adequate knowledge regarding their radiographic appearance is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and facilitate accurate CBCT interpretation, appropriate referral, and effective preoperative planning. Given the relatively small sample size and single-center design, further studies are required to better characterize the prevalence and clinical significance of these variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.