Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42502506›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2026

A rare case of uterine carcinosarcoma presenting as complete uterine inversion: A case report.

Olivia B Foy, Yingao Zhang, Julia Jahansooz, Michelle Pang, Andrew Li

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olivia B FoyDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Yingao ZhangDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Julia JahansoozDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Michelle PangDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Andrew LiDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Uterine inversion is an uncommon phenomenon typically seen in the obstetric setting. Non-puerperal uterine inversion is even more rare and typically caused by benign pathology, though can be found in association with gynecologic malignancies. Surgical intervention is the main treatment with hysterectomy often being performed. Various techniques can be used to restore normal anatomy prior to proceeding with hysterectomy, though when these techniques fail hysterectomy may ultimately need to be performed without correcting the inversion. Case description: We present a case of an 80-year-old woman with endometrial carcinosarcoma causing a complete uterine inversion. Different techniques were attempted to correct the inversion, however, were unsuccessful. Hysterectomy was safely performed with the uterus in its inverted state. Conclusion: Uterine inversion caused by a gynecologic malignancy is a rare phenomenon and poses a unique surgical challenge. The case highlights the feasibility of performing hysterectomy without correcting the inversion.

Indexed as

Case reportEndometrial carcinosarcomaUterine inversion

Identifiers

PMID42502506
PMCPMC13400784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.