ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2026
A rare case of uterine carcinosarcoma presenting as complete uterine inversion: A case report.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uterine inversion is an uncommon phenomenon typically seen in the obstetric setting. Non-puerperal uterine inversion is even more rare and typically caused by benign pathology, though can be found in association with gynecologic malignancies. Surgical intervention is the main treatment with hysterectomy often being performed. Various techniques can be used to restore normal anatomy prior to proceeding with hysterectomy, though when these techniques fail hysterectomy may ultimately need to be performed without correcting the inversion. Case description: We present a case of an 80-year-old woman with endometrial carcinosarcoma causing a complete uterine inversion. Different techniques were attempted to correct the inversion, however, were unsuccessful. Hysterectomy was safely performed with the uterus in its inverted state. Conclusion: Uterine inversion caused by a gynecologic malignancy is a rare phenomenon and poses a unique surgical challenge. The case highlights the feasibility of performing hysterectomy without correcting the inversion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.