ArticleJAAD international2026
International expert consensus on transdermal drug delivery technologies in dermatology.
Article in JAAD international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transdermal drug delivery technologies (TDDTs) enhance drug absorption and therapeutic outcomes in dermatology, yet standardized, evidence-based recommendations for their clinical application remain lacking. Objective: To provide expert consensus recommendations on the clinical application of TDDTs, with a focus on fractional lasers and microneedles. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of 25 experts systematically reviewed current literature and clinical practices. The consensus was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to assess evidence quality and recommendation strength and the modified Delphi method to achieve expert agreement. Results: Evidence-based recommendations were formulated for the use of TDDTs in a variety of dermatological conditions, including cutaneous malignancies and precancerous lesions, viral warts, inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases, and cosmetic indications. Conclusion: Fractional lasers and microneedles are valuable transdermal delivery tools for dermatological therapy. This expert consensus provides practical, evidence-based guidance to support their safe and effective clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.