Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42502389›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

A paleoecological trophic network model of the Early Ordovician Lower Fezouata Shale (Morocco) fossil fauna.

Corinne P Soucy, Francis Banville, Emily Beasley, Bertrand Lefebvre, Juan Carlos Gutiérrez-Marco, Timothée Poisot, Christopher B Cameron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Corinne P SoucyDépartement de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H2V 0B3, Canada.
Francis BanvilleDépartement de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H2V 0B3, Canada.
Emily BeasleyDépartement de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H2V 0B3, Canada.
Bertrand LefebvreLaboratoire de Géologie de Lyon: Terre, Planètes, Environnement (UMR CNRS 5276 LGLTPE), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69622 Villeurbanne, France.
Juan Carlos Gutiérrez-MarcoInstituto de Geociencias CSIC and Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Timothée PoisotDépartement de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H2V 0B3, Canada.
Christopher B CameronDépartement de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H2V 0B3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fauna of the Fezouata Shale, an Early Ordovician fossil Lagerstätte from Morocco, is transitional between the Cambrian and the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE). We compiled a comprehensive taxa list for the Lower Fezouata Shale and developed its empirical trophic network. We compared it to four modern marine networks and a modeling by the niche model, known for accurately representing modern trophic networks. The Fezouata network, compared with modern ones, had higher proportions of top, herbivore, and basal taxa, indicating a community defined by the coexistance of top predators typical of both the Cambrian and the Ordovician and the dominance of low-trophic-level taxa such as filter-feeders, whose expansion characterized the GOBE. These diversifying taxa were also mostly generalists. The Lower Fezouata trophic network did not significantly differ from its niche model prediction, suggesting that most elements of modern trophic network structure had already appeared by the Early Ordovician.

Indexed as

FezouataGreat Ordovician Biodiversification Eventniche modelpaleoecologytrophic networks

Identifiers

PMID42502389
PMCPMC13400953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.