ArticleBrain & spine2026
Association of postoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation with accelerated motor recovery after tumor resection in the supplementary motor area.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Following tumor resection in non-primary motor areas, patients may suffer from paresis. To distinguish between temporary and permanent deficits, our institution uses postoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS). Research question: We investigated the association of postoperative nTMS with motor recovery. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed the postoperative period in a cohort of 14 patients who underwent tumor resection in the supplementary motor area (SMA), suffered a postoperative paresis and underwent a single diagnostic nTMS session. The Medical Research Council Scale (MRCS) of the upper and lower limbs was added to obtain a MRCS-sum score (0-10). Patients were divided into early nTMS (<5 days after surgery) and late nTMS (≥5 days after surgery) groups, and changes in MRCS-sum scores were compared. Results: Following the nTMS session, MRCS-sum improvement was greater in the early nTMS group (2.1 ± 1.1; n = 9) than in the pre-stimulation interval in the late nTMS group (-0.3 ± 1.9; n = 5; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.03). Improvements around the nTMS session were also larger in the early (2.1 ± 1.1) than in the late nTMS group (0.9 ± 0.9), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). Linear regression identified the pre-nTMS MRCS-sum as the strongest predictor of post-nTMS improvement (p = 0.004). Discussion and conclusion: Following surgery for tumors in the SMA, our preliminary findings suggest an association between early nTMS (<5 days after surgery) and accelerated motor recovery from temporary paresis. Prospective trials are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.