ArticleToxicology reports2026
Comprehensive safety assessment of novel dicholine folate vitamin.
Article in Toxicology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Novel vitamin salt forms can offer formulation advantages while retaining the biological activity of the parent compound. This safety assessment evaluates dicholine (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (dicholine L-5-MTHF), a reduced folate source designed to deliver biologically active L-5-MTHF with improved water solubility and stability relative to existing reduced folate salts. As L-5-MTHF salts dissociate to yield L-5-MTHF and their respective counterions, the safety of dicholine L-5-MTHF was assessed using a weight-of-evidence approach that integrates published data for existing L-5-MTHF salts together with information on choline exposure. A standard in vitro genotoxicity battery conducted with dicholine L-5-MTHF, including bacterial reverse mutation, chromosome aberration, and mammalian micronucleus assays, was negative and consistent with the broader genotoxicity profile of other reduced folate sources. In addition, subchronic oral toxicity studies in rats with calcium and sodium L-5-MTHF salts identified no adverse effects at the highest doses tested, and human clinical studies with L-5-MTHF salts support tolerability, including at intakes above the adult UL established for folic acid. Collectively, these data support the safety of dicholine L-5-MTHF at the proposed use level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.