Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42502289›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Variation in Meiofaunal Abundance and Composition Across an Estuarine Bay: Do They Comprise a Coherent and Distinct Entity Displaying Contrasting Patterns to the Macrofauna?

R S K Barnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R S K BarnesInstitute for Coastal and Marine Research Nelson Mandela University Gqeberha Republic of South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5773-5994

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patterns of meiofaunal distribution, abundance and composition were investigated across the disparate regions of the warm-temperate Knysna estuarine bay, South Africa's premier site for estuarine biodiversity and conservation. This locality was represented by five seagrass and five adjacent bare-sediment sites for which earlier data on the equivalent macrofaunal patterns were available. Thus it was possible to compare meiofaunal and macrofaunal responses to the same suite of contrasting habitats. Nematodes, copepods and ostracods, totalling 95.7% of numbers, dominated the Knysna epibenthic meiofauna which showed low (but not necessarily locally atypical) abundance: per core sample values of 19-886 (mean 211) ind. 10 cm

Indexed as

biodiversityestuarymacrofaunameiofaunaseagrassSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID42502289
PMCPMC13401146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.