Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42502240›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the International AIDS Society2026

Using Tenofovir Diphosphate Levels to Evaluate Factors Associated With PrEP Non-Adherence and Performance of Indirect Adherence Measures in Latin America: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicentre Implementation Study (ImPrEP).

Thiago S Torres, Mayara Secco Torres Silva, Brenda Hoagland, Luana Monteiro Spindola Marins, Carolina Coutinho, Emilia M Jalil, Pedro Leite, Marcelo Cunha, Ronaldo Moreira, Iuri C Leite and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Thiago S TorresInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INI-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Mayara Secco Torres SilvaInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INI-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Brenda HoaglandInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INI-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Luana Monteiro Spindola MarinsInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INI-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carolina CoutinhoInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INI-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Emilia M JalilInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INI-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Pedro LeiteInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INI-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marcelo CunhaEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (ENSP-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ronaldo MoreiraInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INI-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Iuri C LeiteEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (ENSP-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Kelika KondaUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Sexualidad, SIDA y Sociedad, Lima, Peru.
Juan GuaniraUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Sexualidad, SIDA y Sociedad, Lima, Peru.
Marcos BenedettiInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INI-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cristina PimentaInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INI-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Hamid Vega-RamirezInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatria Ramón De La Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, Mexico.
Sandra W CardosoInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INI-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carlos F CaceresEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (ENSP-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Peter L AndersonUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Beatriz GrinsztejnInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INI-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Valdilea G VelosoInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INI-Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
for ImPrEP Study Group

Funding

Unitaid / WHO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTenofovir-based oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is pivotal for HIV prevention in Latin America. Monitoring PrEP adherence is crucial for maximizing its impact and identifying individuals who may benefit from additional support. We evaluated the performance of indirect adherence measures and factors associated with PrEP non-adherence in Brazil, Mexico and Peru.

methodsImPrEP was a prospective, multicentre, PrEP implementation study which enrolled 9509 persons from 6 February 2018 to 30 June 2021. For this analysis, we included men who have sex with men (MSM) aged 18-24 years and transgender women aged 18+ years with at least one dried blood spot (DBS) sample collected. Adherence was assessed objectively (tenofovir diphosphate [TFV-DP] levels in DBS) and indirectly (medication possession rate [MPR] and self-report). We estimated area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate the performance of each indirect adherence measure, and the optimal cut-off points for discriminating protective TFV-DP levels based on the Youden index. We used generalized estimating equations to identify factors associated with PrEP non-adherence (TFV-DP<900 fmol/punch).

resultsWe included 2096 participants (1692 young MSM and 404 transgender women) with 4257 DBS samples. Overall, 62.3% DBS samples showed protective TFV-DP levels, which declined over time (68.8% at week 4 to 33.8% at week 124). Both MPR and self-report demonstrated moderate concordance (AUC: 0.74) with no difference between them (p = 0.79). Optimal cut-offs were 97.6% for MPR and 93.3% for self-report; self-report showed higher sensitivity (84.6%), while MPR had higher specificity (62.9%). Among young adults, PrEP non-adherence was higher among transgender women, participants with lower education and from Peru. Among transgender women, PrEP non-adherence was higher among those with younger age, lower education, and from Peru and Mexico. Self-reported sexual behaviours conveying elevated HIV exposure were associated with lower PrEP non-adherence.

conclusionsMPR and self-report are pragmatic and clinically useful adherence monitoring tools for PrEP programmes in Latin America. Social determinants of health, particularly education, emerged as major drivers of PrEP non-adherence among transgender women and young MSM. To maximize impact, PrEP programmes must prioritize person-centred interventions that address stigma within health services, remove barriers to sustained engagement, strengthen health literacy and include long-acting PrEP modalities.

Indexed as

AdenineAnti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsMedication AdherenceOrganophosphatesPre-Exposure ProphylaxisTenofovirAdolescentAdultBrazilFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansLatin AmericaMaleMexicoAdenineAnti-HIV AgentsOrganophosphatesTenofovirtenofovir diphosphateadherenceHIV preventionLatin Americapre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)sexual and gender minoritiesyoung

Identifiers

PMID42502240
PMCPMC13401721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.