ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting subsyndromal delirium in critically ill patients in the emergency department.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting subsyndromal delirium (SSD) risk in critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED). A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 712 patients admitted to the ED resuscitation room of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2025 to August 2025. Patients were randomly divided into training (n = 525) and validation (n = 187) sets. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for SSD. A nomogram prediction model was constructed based on these factors and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Multivariate analysis identified six independent predictors of SSD: marital status (divorced: OR = 12.210, 95%CI 1.334-111.750), physical restraint (OR = 10.386, 95%CI 2.932-36.786), RASS score (OR = 4.090, 95%CI 2.029-8.243), APACHE II score (OR = 1.092, 95%CI 1.011-1.180), Barthel index (OR = 0.968, 95%CI 0.951-0.984), and PSQI score (OR = 1.239, 95%CI 1.123-1.368). The nomogram demonstrated excellent discrimination, with an AUC of 0.898. The calibration curve showed good agreement between predicted and actual probabilities. DCA indicated that the nomogram had significant clinical net benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities. This study developed a novel nomogram that incorporates six readily available clinical variables. This tool effectively predicts the individual risk of SSD in ED critically ill patients, facilitating early identification and targeted preventive interventions to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42502154What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.