ArticleThe pharmacogenomics journal2026
Understanding public perspectives on direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing in the UK: a qualitative study.
Article in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is expanding rapidly in the UK, yet no dedicated regulatory framework currently governs these services. Although a 2021 parliamentary inquiry recommended stronger safeguards and clearer technical standards for genomic testing, these proposals have not been applied to PGx. This study explores public attitudes toward DTC PGx testing, focusing on expectations for pre-test information, quality standards, and NHS data use. We conducted focus groups with members of the public, both with and without prior experience of purchasing DTC PGx tests, or other online health tests. Focus groups were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed, and analysed thematically. We identified three themes: (mis)understanding towards and awareness of DTC PGx testing; altruistic motivation and equity concerns; and (mis)trust. Participants were generally enthusiastic about PGx testing, as long as issues of equity, data protection, and regulation were addressed, with data sharing concerns being particularly prominent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.