ArticleJournal of community health2026
Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Earthquake Preparedness: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Article in Journal of community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Earthquakes have caused devastating impacts throughout history, highlighting the growing importance of pre-disaster risk management. With the increasing use of digital technologies, social media platforms such as YouTube have become widely used sources of information on earthquake preparedness. However, the quality and reliability of such content remain questionable. This study aimed to evaluate the quality, reliability, and content of YouTube videos related to earthquake preparedness. In this cross-sectional study, the top 100 most-viewed videos for the keywords "earthquake preparedness" and "earthquake safety information" were analyzed on January 19, 2026. After applying eligibility criteria, 72 videos were included. Video quality and reliability were assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), while popularity was measured through view rate and the Video Power Index (VPI). Content analysis and non-parametric statistical tests were performed. The findings showed that the overall quality and reliability of videos were low to moderate. Longer videos tended to have higher quality and reliability scores, whereas engagement metrics did not reflect content quality. These results indicate a need to improve the availability of accurate, evidence-based, and practical earthquake preparedness information on digital platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42502127What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.