Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42502119›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Substituent-rebound skeletal editing for precise boron-to-carbon single-atom swapping.

Yan-Bo Li, Fu-Peng Wu, Jasper L Tyler, Constantin G Daniliuc, Frank Glorius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yan-Bo Li *Organisch-Chemisches Institut, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany.
Fu-Peng Wu *Organisch-Chemisches Institut, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jasper L TylerOrganisch-Chemisches Institut, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3155-1847
Constantin G DaniliucOrganisch-Chemisches Institut, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6709-3673
Frank GloriusOrganisch-Chemisches Institut, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany. glorius@uni-muenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0648-956X

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (Alexander von Humboldt Foundation) Henriette Herz Scouting Programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing methods that enable single-atom exchange within an aromatic scaffold, while preserving its peripheral substitution, represents an important but highly ambitious goal in synthesis. In principle, such approaches would allow the impact of a single-atom change within a molecular framework to be distinguished from the effects of also altering the peripheral substituents. Yet despite this conceptual power, single-step methodologies for single-atom exchange in aromatic systems remain rare. Herein, we present a boron-to-carbon swapping reaction via a substituent-rebound process, converting 1,2-benzazaborines into the corresponding quinolines. The employment of glyoxylic acid as the carbon-atom source allows the original substituent on the boron atom to be recaptured and incorporated into the quinoline product, representing a rare example of true single-atom skeletal editing. The transformation exhibits high levels of functional group tolerance and is applicable to the late-stage modifications of natural product and pharmaceutical derivatives. Furthermore, comprehensive mechanistic investigations elucidate the intricacies of this process, establishing a foundation for future single-atom editing manifolds that can facilitate the interrogation of structure-function relationships with atom-level precision.

Identifiers

PMID42502119
PMCPMC13400731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.