ArticlePoultry science2026
Influence of blue, yellow, and red light spectra on growth performance and physiological development of Japanese Quail (Coturnix japonica) under a floor-based rearing system.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of different LED light spectra (blue, red, and sunlight/yellow) on the growth performance of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) reared on the floor. A total of 300 quails age in day 33(235 females, 75 males) were used. Until week 5, all birds were kept under uniform sunlight to eliminate confounding light related stress. During week 6, they were assigned to sunlight (yellow), blue, or red light groups under controlled conditions (24 ± 1 °C, 55-60% humidity). Body weight was recorded weekly, and data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's HSD to determine treatment effects. Machine learning (ML) algorithms Linear Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost were applied to predict growth trends and assess model accuracy. Blue light significantly increased body weight (p < 0.001) at week 6, averaging 298.5 ± 3.2 g, followed by sunlight (284.2 ± 2.8 g) and red light (271.6 ± 4.1 g). A notable Gender × Light interaction (F = 29.23, p < 0.001) showed females responded more positively to blue light. After lighting treatments, the female-male difference reached 50.3 g, while none was observed earlier (p > 0.38). Among ML models, XGBoost performed best (R² = 0.90, RMSE = 3.7 g), followed by Random Forest (R² = 0.84). Blue light improved growth and produced calmer behavior, whereas red light reduced performance. Applying blue light during the growing phase and sunlight during laying appears optimal for productivity and welfare. Future work should test hybrid spectra with gradual color transitions under farm conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.