ReviewDrug and alcohol dependence2026
Mapping and measuring addiction recovery: Recommended protocols through the PHENX toolkit.
Review in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAddiction "recovery" has served as a positive conceptual basis for major public health frameworks, communication strategies, and policies. With greater research interest and increasing explication of the recovery construct a multitude of measures have emerged, prompting a need to reach consensus on recommendations to enable better data harmonization and cross-study syntheses. The PhenX (consensus measures for Phenotypes and eXposures) Toolkit (www.phenxtoolkit.org) is a freely accessible catalog of validated protocols designed to promote data comparability across clinical, epidemiological, and genomic research, yet contained no recovery-specific measures.
methodIn 2024, a Substance Use and Recovery Working Group (SURWG) followed a well-established and detailed PhenX consensus process to identify and recommend protocols suitable for recovery research. Protocols were chosen based on criteria including recovery specificity, brevity, psychometrics, scoring simplicity, and non-proprietary access. The broader scientific community (12 national/regional organizations) provided feedback (respondent N = 86) on the SURWG's preliminary recommendation which was incorporated into final decisions.
resultsIn 2025, the PhenX Toolkit released 15 new recommended protocols across three broad recovery elements: 1. Biopsychological (post-acute withdrawal; craving), 2. Socio-ecological (social relationships;social network characteristics; substance use goal; recovery identity; recovery capital), 3. Treatment and recovery services (Treatment and Recovery Services Use; Satisfaction; and Happiness in Recovery; Mutual-Help).
conclusionsThis PhenX Toolkit SURWG process resulted in a new Substance Use Recovery Specialty Collection of recommended protocols with specific multidimensional applicability. As such, they provide the field with pre-vetted tools that researchers can employ with some confidence to enhance empirical efficiency and return on national research investment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.