ArticleJournal of experimental child psychology2026
Offline and online de novo motor skill learning differs in young children and adults.
Article in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Learning motor skills is fundamental to development. While adults typically outperform children on novel motor tasks, some evidence supports a developmental advantage in motor skill learning for young children. However, most research has focused on motor sequence learning tasks, thus little is known regarding age-related differences in other forms of skill learning, such as de novo motor learning. De novo paradigms involve learning a novel association between movement and its expected outcome and may be more relevant to real-world tasks. In this study, we examined de novo learning using a mirror reversal task in young children (ages 5-8) and adults (ages 18-25) over 3 separate sessions (initial practice, 24-hour retention, 7-day retention). Performance was measured by two metrics that reflect learning the task rule (initial direction error, IDE) and optimizing movement kinematics (path length, PL). Adults out-performed children across all testing and retention sessions but on average, all participants showed improvement in performance with practice. Adults had greater online learning for both IDE and PL. Offline learning was greatest in 8 year old children for IDE, with 5-year-olds and adults showing some performance decrements during retention tests. Consistent with prior studies, these results showed potential developmental advantages for offline but not online learning of de novo task rules and motor control required to optimize the task. We postulate these findings are linked to ongoing neuroplasticity of sensorimotor systems in young children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.