ArticleBrain topography2026
Mapping Depression Correlated Amygdala Communication.
Article in Brain topography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The amygdala is a central hub for emotional processing, whose interactions with large-scale brain networks have been implicated in the pathophysiology of depression. Investigating how amygdala-centered connectivity relates to depression in a community-based sample, rather than focusing exclusively on patients with major depressive disorder, may provide broader insights into depression vulnerability. To this end, functional connectivity (via cross-correlation) and effective connectivity (via Granger causality) were computed using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from 161 adults obtained from the Nathan Kline Institute (NKI)/Rockland community sample. Subsequently, a behavior-guided windowed association analysis identified connectivity indicators correlated with depression severity (Beck Depression Inventory scores), whose contributions to depression prediction were subsequently ranked using machine learning based on a support vector machine. Specifically, higher Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores were associated with increased amygdala functional connectivity with the salience/ventral attention system and the dmPFC component of the default mode network, together with decreased connectivity involving dorsal attention, sensorimotor, and visual regions. Granger causality analyses further revealed predominantly reduced directional influences both to and from the amygdala, particularly between the amygdala and distributed default mode, salience/ventral attention, visual, and subcortical regions, suggesting weakened large-scale information exchange. Machine learning analyses identified amygdala-centered connectivity features, especially those involving the default mode and salience-related systems, as among the most informative predictors of depression severity. Overall, these findings delineate an amygdala-centered multi-system network pathology underlying depressive vulnerability, providing quantifiable neural signatures for early detection and potential targets for intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42501214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.