Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42501210›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026

Tools and Techniques of Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation in Pancreaticobiliary Diseases: A Narrative Review.

Aastha Bharwad, Janet Le, Nirav Thosani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aastha BharwadDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. bharwadaastha@gmail.com.
Janet LeDepartment of Internal Medicine, HCA Kingwood, Kingwood, TX, USA.
Nirav ThosaniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has become an established minimally invasive option for patients with pancreaticobiliary tumors who are not candidates for resection or who have obstructing lesions of the bile duct or pancreas. This narrative review summarizes the devices, technique, and supporting clinical evidence for endoscopic RFA, organized by clinical indication rather than by device alone.

objectiveRFA delivers high-frequency alternating current that produces localized thermal injury and coagulative necrosis. Two endoscopic delivery routes are in use: an ERCP-guided approach, which treats intraductal lesions such as malignant biliary strictures and ampullary tumors using bipolar endobiliary catheters, and an EUS-guided approach, which uses a monopolar needle electrode to ablate pancreatic parenchymal lesions, including solid tumors, neuroendocrine tumors, and pancreatic cysts and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN). Hybrid needles that combine fine-needle aspiration with ablation are an emerging, still investigational, third category. SYNTHESIS/

resultsAcross the published series, technical success generally exceeds 90% for both approaches, with adverse event rates that are mostly low and dominated by self-limited abdominal pain, mild pancreatitis, or cholangitis; perforation and clinically significant bleeding are uncommon when established energy and safety-margin parameters are followed. A proposed, but still poorly characterized, immune-stimulating effect of ablation-induced tissue injury is discussed as a hypothesis rather than an established mechanism.

conclusionsTaken together, the available data support endoscopic RFA as a useful adjunct in the multidisciplinary management of pancreaticobiliary disease, but most of the supporting literature consists of small, single-arm, or retrospective series. Prospective, ideally randomized, studies with standardized energy protocols and longer follow-up are needed before the technique's role in routine practice, particularly for pancreatic cystic lesions and IPMN, can be considered settled.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsRadiofrequency AblationCatheter AblationCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeHumansBiliary ObstructionCholangiocarcinomaEndoscopic Radiofrequency AblationERCPEUSIntraductal Papillary Mucinous NeoplasmPancreatic CancerPancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Identifiers

PMID42501210
PMCPMC13401577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.