ReviewNeuropsychology review2026
Description and Effectiveness of Environmental Approaches to Cognitive Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.
Review in Neuropsychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interventions addressing cognitive impairments after traumatic brain injury (TBI) often rely on survivors' relatively preserved capacity to learn, initiate, and consistently use rehabilitation strategies, along with the ability to apply strategies in various contexts. The cognitive functions required for such active engagement in rehabilitation are commonly impaired after TBI, consequently limiting the benefits of many existing cognitive rehabilitation approaches. Environmental approaches, which involve manipulating the environment to support cognition and function, may benefit TBI survivors, as they do not require active involvement of the user to initiate and maintain their use. Although these approaches are recommended by experts and frequently used, their effectiveness and components are largely unknown. We conducted a systematic review, searching for randomised controlled trials of adults with TBI who received environmental interventions for cognitive or related functional outcomes, compared to any control. Two reviewers independently undertook screening and data extraction following a standardised protocol. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Instruments. Five studies were included in the review. Environmental intervention approaches included prompting (three studies) and trained communication partners (two studies), both of which demonstrated relatively strong evidence for their effectiveness. Key methodological limitations included insufficient blinding to group allocation, randomisation concealment, reliability of outcome measurement, and lack of baseline similarity between groups. Whilst environmental approaches involving prompting and trained communication partners demonstrate potential for improving the daily functioning of individuals with TBI, further research is needed.Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42024592708, registered September 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42501196What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.