ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2026
Examining the association between CT-defined low tongue posture and CPAP adherence.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CT-defined low tongue posture and CPAP adherence: clinical utility, methodological strengths, and diagnostic clarifications.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCPAP therapy is the mainstay treatment for OSA, but adherence remains challenging. This study evaluated whether CT-defined low tongue posture (LTP), operationalized as a tongue-palate air gap on sagittal CT, is associated with CPAP adherence.
methodsRetrospective analysis of 430 adults with OSA (AHI ≥ 20) who underwent PSG, CT imaging, and CPAP initiation at our sleep center. CT-defined LTP was assessed on mid-sagittal CT. CPAP adherence at 3 months was obtained from device-recorded data. Logistic regression identified factors associated with good adherence, defined as ≥ 70% and ≥ 50% of nights with ≥ 4 h of use.
resultsCT-defined LTP was observed in 115 patients (26.7%). Patients with CT-defined LTP had lower average CPAP adherence (39.6% vs. 54.1%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, CT-defined LTP was associated with lower odds of good adherence at both the 70% (adjusted OR 0.447, 95% CI 0.272-0.734, p = 0.001) and 50% (adjusted OR 0.496, 95% CI 0.319-0.772, p = 0.002) thresholds. The model showed limited specificity at the 70% threshold (22.5%) and improved balance at the 50% threshold (specificity 68.3%).
conclusionsCT-defined LTP was associated with poorer CPAP adherence. Given its non-standardized CT definition and limited specificity at the 70% threshold, it should be interpreted as an adjunctive risk marker rather than a standalone screening tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42501151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.