ArticleNeuroinformatics2026
Optimizing Photogrammetry Parameters for 3D Reconstruction of Fresh Brain Specimens.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photogrammetry has become an essential tool in medical and research fields for generating high-fidelity 3D models from 2D images. However, optimizing the imaging and processing parameters remains a challenge, particularly for fresh brain specimens, where repeated imaging is not feasible. This study systematically evaluates the impact of various Metashape alignment settings on 3D reconstruction outcomes, analyzing 12,600 configuration combinations and 63,000 alignments. Our results suggest that the optimal imaging setup consists of four photo sets: two captured at anatomical position (level with the brain and 30 cm above it at a 30° camera tilt) and two identical sets with the basal side facing upwards. The brain should be rotated 3° between shots, generating 120 images per set. Initial processing should be performed without masks using medium-precision alignment in Metashape. If alignment fails, we recommend generating one mask per image, delineating the brain's borders, and applying masks to key points. Notably, higher image density only improves alignment reliability when masking is selected to detected features and may only increase processing time. We also observed variability in alignment results under identical conditions, suggesting an inherent stochastic component in Metashape. Consequently, unsuccessful alignments should be repeated before modifying imaging parameters. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically define an optimal imaging and processing parameters for 3D photogrammetry of fresh brains using a turntable. Future research should focus on determining the minimum number of images required to ensure high-quality reconstructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.