ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Haptic illusion during finger-held disk rotation: revisiting a deceptively simple illusion.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The "disk-rotating" haptic illusion reported by Cormack (1973), in which a disk or coin held in one hand and turned end over end between thumb and forefinger of the other hand is perceived as longer by the turning hand. This illusion may occur because of the interplay of the rotating and holding hands. To separate the contributions of each hand, two custom-made devices were used to allow independent rotation and holding of the disk. Twenty participants handled disks (30 and 39 mm in diameter), and rotated them for one minute under the following conditions: (a) ordinary use of both hands, (b) using both hands but turning and holding the disk using the two custom-made devices simultaneously, and (c) using only one hand for turning or holding. The magnitude of illusion increased to a level comparable to that reported by Cormack (1973) under conditions (a) and (b). However, under condition (c), the illusion for the rotating hand grew about 25% of those obtained under (a) and (b), with almost no illusion for the holding hand. Nevertheless, reconstruction of the estimated illusion using each magnitude of illusion obtained for the "one-hand" conditions of (c), this estimation showed a moderate illusion growing gradually. Rotation by the turning hand may mainly contribute to the illusion, while holding hand is involved with this illusion interactively. The results are discussed along with adaptation, aftereffect, and contrast effect, which may be involved in processing of bimanual signals underlying this illusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.