ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Preoperative prediction of positive surgical margins in prostate cancer using multimodal deep learning model: a multicenter study.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to develop a deep learning model based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical features for predicting PSM risk after radical prostatectomy (RP).
methodsThis retrospective multicenter study included 1177 prostate cancer patients who underwent preoperative MRI and RP across eight institutions. A total of 1022 patients from two institutions were used for model training, while 155 patients from six independent centers formed the external validation cohort. A feature disentanglement-based deep learning model (DESM) was developed to isolate disease-specific features from hospital-specific variations. A multimodal fusion model (MDESM) was further constructed by integrating the DESM-derived imaging signature with clinical variables to enhance prediction accuracy and generalizability. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping was applied to provide interpretability by highlighting model attention regions.
resultsIn the external validation cohort, MDESM achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.843 (95% CI, 0.770-0.911), significantly outperforming the DESM (0.711, 95% CI, 0.607-0.800, p = 0.003, Z = 2.936) and the clinical-only model (0.676, 95% CI, 0.577-0.770, p < 0.001, Z = 3.420). Decision curve analysis demonstrated the highest net benefit for MDESM across a range of threshold probabilities.
conclusionThe MDESM model, based on a feature disentanglement and multimodal fusion strategy, demonstrates the potential to effectively combine MRI and clinical data to achieve accurate PSM prediction. This approach offers a promising tool for preoperative risk stratification and surgical planning in prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42501097What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.