ArticleEpilepsia2026
Detecting high-frequency oscillations in real time during epilepsy surgery with neuromorphic hardware validated to predict postoperative seizure outcome.
Article in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHigh-frequency oscillations (HFOs; 250-500 Hz) in electrocorticography (ECoG) are promising biomarkers for delineating the epileptogenic zone during epilepsy surgery. Accurate, intraoperative real-time detection of HFOs may guide surgical resection to improve seizure outcome.
methodsWe used intraoperative ECoG from 22 patients from Zurich (Nicolet recording device, recording under Sevoflurane) with annotated HFOs to train an innovative automated HFO detector implemented in a spiking neural network (SNN) on neuromorphic hardware. We validated whether the detector could identify clinically relevant HFOs in an independent cohort of 54 patients from Utrecht (Micromed recording device, recording during a pause in propofol administration) by examining whether HFOs remained after resection and whether this predicted seizure outcome. We then tested the detector in real time during surgery, giving direct feedback to the neurosurgeon.
resultsThe optimal detection parameters yielded Spearman R = .71 between channelwise HFO rates detected by the proposed SNN detection and those previously detected by the Spectrum Detector in the training dataset. We found postresection HFOs in nine patients who had poor surgery outcome and in one patient with good surgery outcome in the validation data, resulting in a diagnostic odds ratio = 17 (95% confidence interval = 2.0-150). During a live surgery, the detector analyzed incoming intraoperative ECoG during acquisition, HFOs were successfully captured, and HFO feedback was available within 1 min after completion of the recording period. SIGNIFICANCE: Our automatic detector was easily transferred between centers and anesthesia protocols. We showed the direct use of intraoperative HFO detection as possible real-time feedback to the surgeon to tailor resection, yielding high predictive power of seizure outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.