ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
PCIPG2.0: multi-omics fusion and structure-aware graph autoencoding for protein complex identification.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationProtein complexes execute cellular functions, yet identifying them from protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks remains challenging because interactomes are incomplete and purely topology-driven clustering often lacks mechanistic interpretability. Here we present PCIPG 2.0, an unsupervised framework that explicitly addresses two major bottlenecks in PPI-based complex discovery: missing interactions and limited mechanistic specificity. PCIPG 2.0 first fuses multiple omics views to prioritize high-confidence candidate protein associations and enhance the observed interactome, and then learns structure-aware node representations by aggregating residue embeddings on residue graphs, coupled with a PPI-level graph autoencoder to infer latent complex memberships.
resultsAcross five yeast benchmarks, PCIPG 2.0 consistently improves complex recovery over representative baselines and yields predicted complexes with significantly higher Gene Ontology semantic coherence than size-matched random sets. Literature-supported case studies and AlphaFold3-based assembly analyses further suggest that representative predictions are consistent with functionally coherent and structurally plausible protein assemblies. Together, these results suggest that combining multi-omics-driven interactome completion with residue-informed representation learning provides a useful and mechanistically informed framework for protein complex identification under incomplete interactome measurements. AVAILABILITY: The source code is available at GitHub: https://github.com/hyx-1/PCIPG2.0. The complete reproducibility package, including the code, processed data, configuration files and materials required to reproduce the experiments reported in this manuscript, has been archived on Zenodo with an archival DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20133228. The GitHub repository also provides the README-based usage instructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.