ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
AstroLogics: a simulation-based framework for the analysis of boolean model ensembles.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationBoolean networks (BNs) have emerged as versatile tools for modeling cellular regulatory mechanisms due to their ability to capture key biological features despite their simplicity. Multiple BN synthesis methods have emerged in recent decades, aiming to infer BNs with dynamics that correspond to experimental data. Often, these methods generate multiple BN candidates or "model ensembles". While these ensembles are valuable for representing cell populations and their heterogeneity, they are typically treated as a single component without examining their constituent features.
resultsWe present AstroLogics, a novel framework designed to analyze and identify differences in both dynamical behavior and logical regulation within a BN model ensemble. The framework calculates dynamical distances between BNs through exploration of their state transition graphs (STGs), enabling clustering of similarly functioning models that may represent different cellular fates or signaling mechanisms. AstroLogics also identifies key logical properties that govern each cluster, highlighting the core regulatory structures that differentiate model behaviors. Our approach leverages MaBoSS, a stochastic simulation tool that implements the Boolean Kinetic Monte-Carlo algorithm to address time interpretation in BNs. This probabilistic estimation method allows efficient probing of BN dynamics through stochastic simulations, overcoming the computational limitations of exhaustive STG analysis. Our framework also provides powerful visualization and classification of the BN ensemble. Through multiple use cases, we demonstrate how AstroLogics facilitates comprehensive analyses of model diversity and discovery of key regulatory structures within a BN ensemble. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The AstroLogics package, along with tutorials and datasets, are available at https://github.com/sysbio-curie/AstroLogics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.