Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500849›Full record

Observational studyCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Golden Code Strategy: A Retrospective Study Evaluating the Implementation of a Direct Referral Pathway in Children and Adolescents With Suspected Cancer in a Middle-Income Country.

Farina Esther Arreguín-González, Ana Pamela Gómez-García, Rubén Sebastián-Barajas, Nancy Reynoso-Noverón, Noe Narváez-Morales, Eduardo J Baños-Rodriguez, Oscar Arrieta

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Farina Esther Arreguín-GonzálezPediatric Oncology Service, Centro Médico Nacional "20 de Noviembre", Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5552-8369
Ana Pamela Gómez-GarcíaThoracic Oncology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9392-1647
Rubén Sebastián-BarajasPediatric Oncology Service, Centro Médico Nacional "20 de Noviembre", Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0002-1520-7007
Nancy Reynoso-NoverónResearch Directorate, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7784-2287
Noe Narváez-MoralesPediatric Oncology Service, Centro Médico Nacional "20 de Noviembre", Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0000-9969-5401
Eduardo J Baños-RodriguezPediatric Oncology Service, Centro Médico Nacional "20 de Noviembre", Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0009-7100-9161
Oscar ArrietaThoracic Oncology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1164-3779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionIn Mexico, delays in pediatric cancer diagnosis remain a major barrier to timely care and are partly driven by inefficiencies in referral pathways. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a direct pathway on referral intervals for patients with suspected childhood cancer treated at a high-specialty hospital in Mexico.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational cohort study based on a comprehensive review of medical records of patients referred to a high-specialty hospital in Mexico between 2017 and 2022. Patients' characteristics, along with dates from symptom recognition to diagnosis, were collected. The exposure was the referral pathway: standard versus direct (Golden Code strategy) pathway, which enables access to pediatric oncology through a zero-rejection policy. The primary outcome was the time attributable to oncological referral (TAOR), analyzed as a continuous variable and a dichotomous outcome. Secondary intervals were calculated using standardized definitions. Regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with untimely (>7 days) referral.ResultsA total of 399 patients were included. The direct pathway was associated with a shorter TAOR compared to the standard pathway (median 2.0 vs. 7.0 days; p<0.001). The proportion of timely referrals was substantially higher in the direct pathway (91.3%) than in the standard (50.6%) and reduced the likelihood of an untimely referral (OR = 0.098, 95% CI: 0.055-0.173; p<0.001). No differences were observed in other diagnostic intervals.ConclusionThe direct referral pathway improves the timeliness and consistency of access to pediatric oncology care by reducing referral delays and increasing the proportion of patients evaluated within recommended referral intervals. However, the absence of changes in the secondary intervals, such as time to oncological diagnosis, highlights the need for complementary actions targeting downstream diagnostic processes. Strengthening referral systems represents a feasible and impactful strategy to address delays in pediatric cancer care in middle-income settings.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsReferral and ConsultationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMexicoRetrospective StudiesTreatment Delayadolescentscarechildhoodchildrendelaysdiagnosispediatric cancerwaiting times

Identifiers

PMID42500849
PMCPMC13401640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.