Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500843›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Dysphagia Care Processes on Acute Stroke Wards: An Ethnographic Study of Barriers and Facilitators Relevant to Stroke-Associated Pneumonia.

Sabrina A Eltringham, Craig J Smith, Ben Bray, Emma Richards, Jo Burke, Sue Pownall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sabrina A EltringhamSpeech and Language Therapy Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0453-2456
Craig J SmithDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, Manchester, Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ben BrayDepartment of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Emma RichardsNeurosciences Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Jo BurkeSpeech and Language Therapy Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Sue PownallSpeech and Language Therapy Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7108-8386

Funding

Sheffield Hospitals Charity 202112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDysphagia is associated with increased risk of stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP). The multifactorial pathophysiology of SAP and the interplay of care processes make it challenging to unpack which components are associated with risk of SAP. The aim of the research was to capture contextual aspects of dysphagia management to build knowledge of care processes relevant to SAP.

methodsThe methodology was an ethnographic approach. The method was participant observation. Implementation of specialist swallow recommendations, positioning, and oral care processes of 10 stroke patients was observed around mealtimes during the first 72-h of hospital admission. Data was analysed thematically. People affected by stroke were involved in the data analysis process and in the co-generation of themes and implications for clinical practice.

resultsFour themes were generated from the data: 1. Patient preparation for mealtimes and medications; 2. Variability in resources, knowledge and implementation of dysphagia care; 3. Swallowing and oral care are everyone's business; and 4. Communication about the person's dysphagia management plan and staff attitudes.

conclusionsThis research enhances understanding of environmental barriers and facilitators that shape how dysphagia care is enacted in acute stroke settings, and how variability in everyday practice may influence circumstances relevant to SAP risk. The findings highlight the role of communication processes, patient and carer information needs, staff awareness of dysphagia diets, mealtime preparation, oral care practices, and access to resources in supporting the implementation of swallowing management plans within routine care. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject The pathophysiology of stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) is multifactorial. Patients are most susceptible to SAP during their first 72 h post-stroke. Preventative measures to identify dysphagia as early as possible, such as early dysphagia screening and a specialist swallowing assessment, are associated with reduced risk of SAP. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge Increased understanding of how dysphagia care processes may impact on SAP. Identifies environmental barriers and facilitators to minimising potential risk of SAP, specifically relating to the implementation of the specialist swallowing assessment recommendations, positioning and oral care. Identifies areas for clinical improvement. What are the potential or clinical implications of this work? Swallowing management plans are complex and often only partially enacted, with key elements beyond diet and fluid modification frequently overlooked. Dysphagia management requires a genuinely multidisciplinary and system-wide approach, involving all ward staff and informed family and carers. Effective implementation depends on system-level factors which include: clear, consistent and up-to-date sharing of swallowing plans across all channels; staff, patient and carer education; access to appropriate resources; and supportive ward practices and attitudes.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersPneumoniaPneumonia, AspirationStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedcare processesdysphagiastrokestroke‐associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID42500843
PMCPMC13401222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.