ArticleCureus2026
Economic Burden and Cost Differences Between Branded and Generic Topical Antifungals in India.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIndia's pharmaceutical market is characterized by a significant presence of both generic and branded drugs, particularly for common ailments such as superficial mycoses (SFMs), which pose a substantial public health and economic burden. Patients in tropical countries like India, which have common superficial mycoses, need prolonged treatment because of their recurrence rates after initial treatment and due to incomplete therapy. Given the high variability in drug pricing and the imperative for cost-effective healthcare, a pharmacoeconomic analysis comparing generic and branded topical antifungals in India is crucial to inform prescribing practices and optimize resource allocation.
methodsThe price comparison of various topical antifungal medications from different brands was conducted by using the latest information from the "Monthly Index of Medical Specialties" August to October 2025, and 1mg online pharmacy and Jan Aushadhi website. The study calculated the total expenses for 30 mL and 30 g dosage forms, which included cream, ointment, lotion, eye drops, and shampoo products of each drug brand. We conducted a comparison between different drug brands through their cost ratio, and percentage cost variation (PCV) analysis was done, keeping generic medicines prices (retrieved from the Jan Aushadhi website) as baseline values.
resultsThe data analysis showed a significant variation in the costs of different brands of topical antifungals in the Indian market. After analysis, we identified itraconazole 1% ointment to have the highest cost variation at 8335.1%, followed by clotrimazole dusting powder (4740%). Ketoconazole 2% cream, bifonazole 1% lotion, and sertaconazole shampoo showed the smallest variation at 3.29%, 3.5%, and 11.3%, respectively. When generic and branded topical antifungals were compared, the highest cost variation was seen for clotrimazole 1% cream (3431.7%), and the least variation was observed for ketoconazole 2% powder (135.4%). When combination topical antifungals were compared, the highest percentage cost variation of 1479.4% was seen for clotrimazole 1%w/w and beclomethasone dipropionate 0.025%w/w cream, and the least percentage cost variation of 38.8% was seen for terbinafine (1% w/w) + ciprofloxacin (1% w/w) + metronidazole (1% w/w) + clobetasol (0.05% w/w).
conclusionThe market for topical antifungal agents demonstrates substantial price variation among available products. Regulatory authorities, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and clinicians must collaborate to achieve optimal reductions in drug costs. Strict implementation of cost regulation policies, along with increased awareness among clinicians regarding the rational selection of cost-effective therapies, is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.