ArticleCureus2026
Perforated Subhepatic Appendicitis Mimicking Hepatobiliary Pathology: A Case Report and Narrative Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subhepatic appendicitis is a particularly rare anatomical variant presenting with atypical right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain mimicking hepatobiliary pathology. This mimicry frequently leads to diagnostic delay and subsequent increased risk of complications. A 41-year-old man presented to the Emergency Department with acute RUQ pain, radiating to the back and shoulder, accompanied by constitutional and gastrointestinal symptoms. RUQ ultrasound visualized no gallbladder abnormalities; subsequent CT scan revealed a dilated appendix with a rounded tip and possible presence of an abscess. Initial surgical intervention was attempted laparoscopically; however, conversion to an open appendectomy was required due to the complex anatomy, including a subhepatic cecum adhered to the retroperitoneum, and intraoperative bleeding. The cecal caput was divided to preserve the ileocecal valve. Pathological assessment was consistent with appendicitis with rupture due to postinflammatory changes. The postoperative course was largely uncomplicated with transient ileus, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. Although subhepatic appendicitis is rare, it should be considered when patients present with RUQ pain and hepatobiliary assessment proves negative. In case of a nondiagnostic ultrasound, CT imaging should be employed early in the diagnostic exploration. As conversion from a laparoscopic to an open approach may be warranted in these cases, the surgical team should be vigilant when encountering such a patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.