ReviewCureus2026
Percutaneous Endoscopic Sigmoidopexy for Recurrent Sigmoid Volvulus: A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Clinical Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sigmoid volvulus represents a significant clinical challenge, particularly in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities who experience recurrent episodes following initial endoscopic decompression. While definitive surgical resection remains the gold standard for preventing recurrence, many patients are unsuitable for major abdominal surgery due to advanced age, medical frailty, or elevated surgical risk. Percutaneous endoscopic sigmoidopexy has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative that involves endoscopically guided fixation of the sigmoid colon to the anterior abdominal wall, thereby restricting colonic mobility and preventing the anatomical conditions necessary for volvulus formation. This systematic review comprehensively evaluates the available evidence on this technique for preventing recurrent sigmoid volvulus. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched major databases and identified five studies comprising fourteen patients who underwent the procedure. The patient population was uniformly elderly and medically complex, with multiple prior volvulus episodes. Technical approaches varied considerably across studies, including different fixation devices, numbers of anchors, spatial configurations, and use of fluoroscopic guidance. Notably, no recurrences were documented during follow-up, though duration varied markedly across studies. Based on this limited sample, the complication profile was generally favorable, with most adverse events being minor and self-limiting, though procedure-related mortality occurred in patients with severe underlying comorbidities. While the evidence base remains limited to small case series and reports, the findings suggest that percutaneous endoscopic sigmoidopexy may represent a viable option for carefully selected high-risk patients with recurrent sigmoid volvulus who are unsuitable for or decline definitive surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.