ReviewCureus2026
Men's Experiences and Decision-Making in Erectile Dysfunction Treatment: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a qualitative evidence synthesis investigating men's clinical experiences, psychosocial challenges, and decision-making related to help-seeking and treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). The findings suggest that ED affects relationship experiences, self-esteem, psychosocial well-being, and help-seeking behaviors. Studies identified through Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO were synthesized qualitatively, focusing on adult men's experiences of ED, disclosure, treatment engagement, and decision-making. The review protocol was not prospectively registered. Searches were conducted in March 2026, and the included studies represented diverse clinical contexts, including general ED care, diabetes care, cancer survivorship, and cardiovascular rehabilitation. Eight qualitative studies involving 209 participants were included, and four major themes emerged: masculinity, stigma, and self-silencing; relational consequences influencing help-seeking and disclosure; healthcare communication as a barrier or facilitator to care; and treatment trade-offs, adherence, and acceptability. Men frequently reported negative effects on emotional well-being and help-seeking behaviors due to ED. Delay and hesitation in disclosure and help-seeking were attributed to fear of judgment, lack of support, and negative effects on confidence and self-esteem. Participants valued respectful communication from healthcare professionals and preferred supportive, individualized approaches that included relationship support. Decisions to seek treatment were influenced not only by perceived effectiveness but also by side effects, emotional burden, relationship concerns, and communication experiences. The findings should be interpreted with consideration of the limited number of included studies and the restriction to English-language publications. These findings suggest that ED care should incorporate respectful, stigma-sensitive communication and individualized counseling to facilitate treatment-seeking and improve treatment engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.