Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500757›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

A Comparison of Nurse-Driven and Combined Physician and Nurse-Driven Interventions for Improving Sleep Quality and Quantity in Hospitalized Patients.

Mitchell T Wong, Alexander T Lo, Stephanie D Abdulrahman, Reid Sasaki, Gregory Seymann, Alan Moazzam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mitchell T WongInternal Medicine, UC (University of California) San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, USA.
Alexander T LoMedicine, UC (University of California) San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, USA.
Stephanie D AbdulrahmanNursing, University of California, San Diego Health, San Diego, USA.
Reid SasakiHospital Medicine, University of California, San Diego Health, San Diego, USA.
Gregory SeymannHospital Medicine, University of California, San Diego Health, San Diego, USA.
Alan MoazzamHospital Medicine, University of California, San Diego Health, San Diego, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Inpatient sleep disruption is prevalent and contributes to delirium, impaired recovery, and increased healthcare utilization. Causative factors include illness severity, unfamiliar surroundings, circadian disruption, and poorly timed clinical tasks. Non-pharmacologic, protocol-driven approaches to improving inpatient sleep remain underutilized despite evidence of their benefit. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-driven and combined nurse-physician sleep interventions in subjective sleep quality, patient satisfaction, and hospital resource utilization among medical-surgical inpatients. Methods Three sequential cohorts of medical-surgical inpatients were enrolled: a control group receiving standard care; a nurse-intervention cohort receiving nightly nurse-led sleep rounds and a personalized Sleep Hygiene Menu encompassing environmental modifications, comfort measures, and relaxation aids; and a combined nurse-physician cohort in which hospitalists additionally modified overnight order sets to reduce non-urgent vital sign checks, laboratory draws, and medication administrations during a protected sleep window (10:00 PM-6:00 AM). Cohorts were compared on demographics, LACE index scores (an acronym for Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Comorbidity, and Emergency department visits), responses to a modified Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ), and Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOSS) scores. Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores and sitter hours were captured for the control and nurse-intervention cohorts. Results A total of 92 patients were enrolled (29 control, 31 nurse intervention, 32 nurse+physician intervention), generating 102 survey responses (38 control, 32 nurse intervention, 32 nurse+physician intervention). Both intervention cohorts reported significantly deeper sleep, shorter sleep latency, fewer nocturnal awakenings, faster return to sleep, and better overall sleep quality compared to controls (all p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the two intervention groups (p > 0.05 for all values). HCAHPS data showed an 8.47% increase in patient satisfaction with nighttime quietness (p = 0.0007). Sitter hours were reduced by 896 hours over seven months, yielding $21,351.68 in cost savings. Conclusion Structured nurse-driven sleep interventions significantly improved inpatient sleep quality and patient satisfaction, and generated measurable cost savings. Adjunctive physician order modifications provided no additional benefit over nursing interventions alone. These findings support routine integration of sleep hygiene protocols into inpatient nursing care and highlight an opportunity for hospitalists to champion multidisciplinary sleep promotion as a quality and cost-reduction strategy. Future studies should incorporate objective sleep measurement using wearable actigraphy devices.

Indexed as

inpatient sleep qualitypatient satisfactionsleep in hospitalized patientssleep interventionssleep promotion

Identifiers

PMID42500757
PMCPMC13396424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.