ArticleNational science review2026
A general data-driven framework for scalable electron tomography.
Article in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning for scalable atomic electron tomography.National science review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electron tomography (ET) is crucial for determining the three-dimensional (3D) structure of materials in real space but challenging due to the inherent missing wedge, high dose, and limited depth-of-field. Although deep learning can address these challenges in principle, the scarcity of ET data severely limits its application. In this study, we propose a general data-driven ET reconstruction framework that uses extensive and readily available random high-entropy projections to construct large-scale datasets. By integrating both real structural priors and depth-dependent imaging physics, the framework enables high-quality 3D reconstruction independent of specific materials or resolutions. Using this strategy, we successfully determine the 3D atomic structure of a 13-nm Pt nanoparticle containing 52 138 atoms, achieving a root-mean-square displacement of 22.6 pm; the projection consistency error is significantly reduced, effectively expanding the depth-of-field limit of atomic-scale ET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.