ReviewTobacco prevention & cessation2026
Vaping cessation interventions: A narrative review of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use, particularly among young individuals, has led to a pressing need for effective vaping cessation interventions. We conducted a narrative review of published and ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating behavioral, pharmacological, and combination interventions aimed at vaping cessation among adolescents and adults using e-cigarettes. PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from 2004 (year of first e-cigarette patent) to 27 April 2025. The outcome of interest was abstinence from vaping at the maximum follow-up and results were synthesized narratively. A total of 11 RCTs, involving 8182 participants, were identified. These trials investigated behavioral therapy, including tailored text messaging support (n=4), nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (n=3), varenicline (n=3), and cytisine (n=1). Studies were published between 2021 and 2025, with follow-up ranging from 1 to 24 months, and most focused on adults or young adults. Behavioral interventions, particularly text messaging programs, showed potential to support vaping cessation beyond 6 months, although findings were inconsistent across trials. Varenicline demonstrated promise as a pharmacological aid; however, available RCTs had small sample sizes and short follow-up periods, limiting the strength of the evidence. None of the RCTs investigating the efficacy of NRT (567 participants) or cytisine (160 participants) demonstrated superiority over control following treatment discontinuation. Fourteen ongoing RCTs were also identified, most of which are evaluating behavioral approaches in younger populations. Overall, the current evidence base for vaping cessation remains limited, highlighting the need for larger, high-quality trials with longer follow-up to establish effective interventions across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.