ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2026
Frequency and clinicopathological features of somatic neoplasms arising in ovarian mature teratomas: a single-center experience.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Somatic neoplasms arising in mature teratomas (SN-MT) are rare clinical entities that pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This study aims to determine the frequency of SN-MT and evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics that distinguish these cases from uncomplicated mature teratomas (MT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 500 cases of presumed ovarian mature teratomas evaluated at a single center between 2006 and 2021. After strict exclusion criteria, 385 patients were included. All histopathological slides underwent systematic pathological re-evaluation by expert pathologists. Clinical, radiological, and laboratory data were compared between the MT and SN-MT groups. Results: The overall incidence of somatic neoplasms (benign and malignant) was 3.1% (n = 12), with a malignant transformation rate of 2.07% (n = 8). The histological spectrum was highly heterogeneous and comprised both benign and malignant entities. Benign tumors identified in MTs included paraganglioma, choroid plexus papilloma, and adnexal tumor, whereas malignant tumors included squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, adult-type granulosa cell tumor, and mixed carcinoma. The SN-MT group exhibited significantly larger mean tumor diameters compared to the MT group (9.45 ± 4.22 cm vs. 6.67 ± 3.32 cm, p < 0.05). On gross examination, mixed solid-cystic architecture was a powerful predictor of neoplasia (83.3% in SN-MT vs. 22.3% in MT, p < 0.0001). Preoperative serum tumor markers (CA 125, CA 19-9, and CEA) showed no significant discriminatory value. False-negative findings on intraoperative frozen section analysis may be attributable to the focal distribution of these lesions. Conclusion: SN-MT is a rare but histologically diverse condition. Large tumor size and the presence of solid components on macroscopic examination should raise suspicion of somatic transformation. Given the limitations of frozen section analysis and serum markers, rigorous macroscopic sampling and expert pathological examination remain the gold standard for diagnosis. While early-stage disease carries a favorable prognosis, the heterogeneity of subtypes necessitates individualized management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.