Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500594›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

Unraveling silence: police perceptions and responses to male victims of rape.

Katlego Vincent Scheepers, Letitia Smuts, Anthony Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katlego Vincent ScheepersDepartment of Sociology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Letitia SmutsDepartment of Sociology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Anthony BrownCollege of Graduate Studies, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Male victims of rape face significant barriers when reporting to the South African Police Service (SAPS), where hegemonic masculinity and heteronormative institutional cultures render male victimhood socially unintelligible. This study examines how police perceptions and institutional practices produce epistemic and secondary victimization for male rape victims. Methods: A qualitative design using in-depth semi-structured interviews was employed. Fourteen SAPS officers in Johannesburg were recruited via purposive and snowball sampling. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis following Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework, within an interpretive-constructivist epistemology, an intersectional theoretical framework, and Connell's hegemonic masculinity theory. Findings: Key themes emerged: (1) internalized rape myths and stigma as barriers to reporting male rape; (2) heteronormativity, homophobia and policing of male victimhood homophobia and the role of heteronormativity and homophobia in policing male victimhood. The section also addresses secondary and epistemic victimization through dismissive and intrusive questioning, and emergent pockets of resistance among officers advocating for more inclusive, victim-centred practices. Discussion: The findings demonstrate that hegemonic masculinity functions not only as a social ideology but as an institutional logic governing recognition, credibility, and access to justice for male rape victims. Gay and gender-nonconforming individuals face compounded stigma. Structural interventions, including gender-sensitive training and institutional reform, are needed to address the systemic marginalization of male rape victims within South African policing.

Indexed as

hegemonic masculinityheteronormativitymale rapepolicingsapssecondary victimization

Identifiers

PMID42500594
PMCPMC13397937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.