ArticleBrain communications2026
Cortical speech envelope tracking reflects lesion-symptom profiles in post-stroke aphasia.
Article in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comprehending connected speech is critical for human interaction and is vulnerable in post-stroke aphasia. Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying impaired speech listening is necessary for accurate and effective assessment and treatment. Neural speech tracking methods offer a window into naturalistic speech processing and may reveal causal contributions to comprehension. EEG was recorded during story listening in 15 people with aphasia with left temporal lesions (temporal group), 14 people with aphasia with left frontal lesions (frontal group) and 15 age- and hearing-matched controls (control group). All participants listened to clear and unintelligible stories (∼12 min per condition). Controls additionally listened to low-intelligibility stories that equated comprehension success to the temporal group. Envelope tracking was measured at syllable- (theta) and multi-syllable- (delta) rates. Neural decoding and encoding analyses measured global (whole-brain) and local (sensor-wise) speech tracking, respectively. Group comparisons used linear mixed-effects regression. Linear and quadratic relationships assessed associations between neural tracking and behavioural measures of comprehension while accounting for covariates. Behavioural measures of comprehension showed the temporal group were significantly impaired compared to both frontal and control groups. Comparison of intelligible and unintelligible speech found that intelligibility affected delta but not theta tracking-suggesting that delta tracking is linked to higher-order linguistic processing and theta tracking reflects sensory responses. Theta and delta envelope decoding reflected group/comprehension status: tracking was reduced in the temporal group compared to the control group, but tracking was not significantly different when control comprehension was behaviour-matched via speech degradation. Delta encoding produced a similarly behaviour-linked pattern, but theta encoding was lesion-rather than behaviour-sensitive, in that reduced tracking was observed in temporo-parietal sensors in both aphasia groups. Theta tracking correlated with comprehension in a lesion-specific manner. Positive correlations between theta tracking and comprehension were found in the temporal group and negative correlations in the frontal and control groups. This produced a quadratic (inverted-U) relationship between theta tracking and comprehension success across all participants. The control-like, negative theta tracking-comprehension correlations in the frontal group are consistent with listening effort effects in which greater task difficulty result in greater tracking. In the temporal group, where comprehension was impaired, better envelope tracking at syllable rates may help build a stable representation of the speech stream supporting phonological and lexical analysis and comprehension. These results indicate that envelope tracking reflects a combination of lesion and symptom profiles and is a viable method for investigating the mechanisms of speech comprehension in aphasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.