Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500545›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Contact lens-related versus non-contact lens-related

Burak Ozturk, Saba Anwar, Khawaja Muhammad Ammar Ali Javed, Yu Jeat Chong, Gibran Butt, Liying Low, Dalia G Said, Harminder S Dua, Ankur Barua, Anil Aralikatti and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Burak Ozturk *Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Saba Anwar *Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Khawaja Muhammad Ammar Ali JavedBirmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Yu Jeat ChongBirmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Gibran ButtBirmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Liying LowBirmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Dalia G SaidDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Harminder S DuaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Ankur BaruaBirmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Anil AralikattiBirmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Saaeha RauzBirmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Darren S J TingBirmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: A retrospective cohort study of culture-confirmed PA keratitis cases that presented to the Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre (Birmingham, UK) and Queen's Medical Centre (Nottingham, UK) between August 2016 and January 2020. Demographics, clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes were analysed and compared between CL-related and non-CL-related groups. Results: Sixty-six patients (66 eyes) were included; mean age was 54.0 ± 20.9 years and 59.1% were female. CL wear accounted for 35 (53.1%) cases. At presentation, mean CDVA was 1.26 ± 0.96 logMAR (~6/120 Snellen). Hospitalisation occurred in 71.2% cases, with 19.7% cases requiring surgery. Most isolated PA (64, 97.0%) were antibiotic-susceptible. Compared to non-CL-related keratitis, CL-related keratitis was more commonly associated with younger age, better initial vision, smaller and non-central ulcers, and absence of hypopyon (all Conclusion: PA keratitis remains a significant cause of ocular morbidity in the United Kingdom. CL-related disease shows distinct clinical features and better outcomes likely due to lower presenting disease severity and timely management of the disease.

Indexed as

contact lenscorneal infectioncorneal ulcermicrobial keratitisrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID42500545
PMCPMC13395769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.