Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500535›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Analysis of adverse event reports associated with complementary health products in Singapore from 2017 to 2023.

Yi-Ling Quek, Yun Zeng, Xiaowei Ge, Min-Yong Low, Suet-Leng P Ng, Mun-Yee Tham, Sally Soh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yi-Ling QuekPharmaceutical Division, Applied Sciences Group, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore, Singapore.
Yun ZengPharmaceutical Division, Applied Sciences Group, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore, Singapore.
Xiaowei GePharmaceutical Division, Applied Sciences Group, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore, Singapore.
Min-Yong LowPharmaceutical Division, Applied Sciences Group, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore, Singapore.
Suet-Leng P NgVigilance and Compliance Branch, Health Products Regulation Group, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore, Singapore.
Mun-Yee ThamVigilance and Compliance Branch, Health Products Regulation Group, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore, Singapore.
Sally SohVigilance and Compliance Branch, Health Products Regulation Group, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The use of complementary health products (CHPs), including Chinese Proprietary Medicines (CPMs), health supplements, traditional medicines and homeopathic medicines, has become increasingly prevalent in Singapore's multicultural society. While these products are widely used for maintaining health and treating minor ailments and are generally safe, potential adverse effects have been reported. This study analyzes adverse event reports related to CHPs submitted to Singapore Health Sciences Authority (HSA) from 2017 to 2023. Methods: AE reports involving CHPs assessed by the Vigilance and Compliance Branch (VCB) of HSA from 2017 to 2023 were collated and analyzed. The analysis included patient demographics, AE details, suspected product information, medical history, laboratory results, concomitant therapies, and reporter's profession. Results: Of the 182,131 AE reports associated with pharmaceutical products and CHPs, 727 reports (0.4%) were associated with CHPs. Health supplements accounted for the highest number of reports (68% of total). "Skin and appendages disorders" were the most commonly reported system organ class, with glucosamine-containing products accounting for the highest number of adverse events. Patients primarily used CHPs for pain relief (33.1%), general health and wellbeing (20.6%), and weight management (8.8%). Products found to contain undeclared illegal substances were most frequently indicated for pain relief. The three most common adulterants were dexamethasone, chlorpheniramine, and prednisolone. Discussion: While CHPs are generally safe, adulterated products, especially those from dubious sources, pose real health risks. Healthcare professionals and consumers should remain vigilant about potential adulteration and report suspected CHPs related AEs. Even when causality remains unclear, reporting supports timely regulatory actions when concerning patterns emerge. Conclusion: This study examined 727 adverse event reports associated with CHPs between 2017 and 2023, accounting for 0.4% of all reported adverse events. Health supplements were the most frequently reported category, with glucosamine-containing products accounting for the highest number of adverse events, predominantly affecting the skin. Products found to contain undeclared illegal substances were most frequently indicated for pain relief, with dexamethasone, chlorpheniramine, and prednisolone being the most common adulterants found. These findings highlight the need for continued vigilance in the monitoring of CHPs to safeguard public health.

Indexed as

adulterantsadverse eventscomplementary health productspharmacovigilanceskin and appendages disorders

Identifiers

PMID42500535
PMCPMC13395880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.