Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500530›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

Human-machine collaboration in colorectal cancer screening: a narrative review of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy.

Chi Zhang, Jinguo Liu, Zhou Zhang, Liangliang Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chi ZhangDepartment of Endoscopy Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jinguo LiuDepartment of Endoscopy Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhou ZhangDepartment of Endoscopy Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Liangliang YuDepartment of Endoscopy Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a globally prevalent malignant tumor, and colonoscopy serves as the gold standard for its early screening and diagnosis. However, traditional colonoscopy highly depends on the experience of endoscopists, which is associated with limitations such as a relatively high miss rate and inadequate inspection quality control. This narrative review summarizes the application progress, clinical value, and existing challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) in colonoscopy. Currently, AI has formed three mature application directions, namely computer-aided detection, diagnosis, and quality control training, which extensively cover key links of colonoscopy, including bowel preparation assessment, cecal landmark identification, withdrawal quality monitoring, auxiliary lesion detection, and polyp character evaluation. Preliminary evidence suggests that AI can promote the standardization of colonoscopy procedures and the refinement of quality control indicators, potentially bridge the diagnostic gap between endoscopists with different levels of experience, and reduce the misdiagnosis of minor lesions. However, current studies predominantly report positive effects, and there is a lack of long-term outcome data, standardized methodology, and discussion of human-AI interaction dynamics. In conclusion, AI is expected to become an important auxiliary tool for the early screening and diagnosis of CRC, but further rigorous evaluation of its clinical value and collaborative workflow is needed.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecolonoscopycolorectal cancerearly screeninghuman-machine collaborationnarrative reviewquality control

Identifiers

PMID42500530
PMCPMC13398207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.