ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
A precise oral glucose loading
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We evaluated the feasibility of using a precise oral glucose loading combined with subcutaneous insulin administration protocol for Methods: 179 consecutive CAD patients complicated by DM were enrolled. Oral glucose was given at variable doses based on baseline blood glucose, and subcutaneous insulin was injected at adjusted doses according to post-load glucose levels before FDG injection. SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging and PET myocardial metabolic imaging were performed using a one-day protocol. The image quality and adverse reaction data were analyzed. Results: Among 179 patients, FDG image quality was scored as excellent in 57.5%, very good in 31.8%, good in 7.8%, fair in 1.7% and non-diagnostic in 1.1%. When patients were stratified by blood glucose level at time of FDG injection >7.77 mmol/L, 5.55-7.77 mmol/L and <5.55 mmol/L, the image quality were excellent in 43.1, 60.4 and 74.1%, very good in 43.1, 30.7 and 14.8%, good in 9.8, 5.9 and 11.1%, fair in 3.9, 1.0% and 0, and non-diagnostic in 0, 2.0% and 0, respectively. Patients were divided into insulin therapy group and oral medication group, the image quality were excellent in 50.7 and 62.5%, very good in 33.3 and 30.8%, good in 10.7 and 5.8%, fair in 2.7 and 1.0%, and non-diagnostic in 2.7% and 0, respectively. Patients with blood glucose at time of FDG injection >7.77 mmol/L had significantly lower odds of excellent image quality ( Conclusion: The precise oral glucose loading protocol prior to
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.